Fairthorn, an extra care housing scheme in Sheffield providing personal care to 8 people, was rated Good overall following a December 2023 inspection under the KLOE framework. The service demonstrated safe practices, consistent staffing, robust governance, and a strong person-centred culture with no failure themes identified.
Strengths
· People felt safe and trusted staff; consistent staffing with low turnover praised by relatives
· Personalised risk assessments covering medicines, mobility, falls, premises, and nutrition
· Staff trained in safeguarding, infection control, and medicines management
· Robust quality assurance systems with audits identifying and addressing shortfalls
· Strong person-centred culture empowering people to make decisions about their care
Quality-Statement breakdown (12)
safe: Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuse
Good
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
safe: Staffing and recruitmentGood
safe: Using medicines safelyGood
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
well-led: Planning and promoting person-centred, high-quality care and support with opennessGood
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about their roles, and understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirementsGood
well-led: How the provider understands and acts on the duty of candourGood
well-led: Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staffGood
well-led: Continuous learning and improving careGood
Fairthorn, a small extra care housing domiciliary service in Sheffield, was rated Good across all five key questions at its November 2017 inspection. The service had successfully remediated a prior breach of Regulation 13 (safeguarding) identified in 2016, with strong leadership, person-centred care, and effective governance systems now in place.
Concerns (4)
criticalSafeguarding: “breach of Regulation 13...Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment...registered manager had not ensured the systems and processes in place were operated effectively”
moderateMedication management: “seven [safeguarding notifications] were regarding medicines errors, poor recording, and poor moving and handling techniques”
moderateRecord keeping: “seven were regarding medicines errors, poor recording, and poor moving and handling techniques”
minorStaff training: “there were two members of staff on the matrix who were overdue in completing one area of training”
Strengths
· People consistently reported feeling safe and well cared for, with staff demonstrating kindness, dignity and respect at all times
· Robust safeguarding improvements made since the previous inspection; no longer in breach of Regulation 13
· Comprehensive recruitment procedures including DBS checks, references and proof of identity
· Medicines administration records fully completed and staff regularly observed by the registered manager
· Staff received regular supervisions (minimum four per year) and annual appraisals, tracked via a 1:1 tracker
Fairthorn, a domiciliary care agency supporting eight people in an extra care scheme, was rated Requires Improvement overall following its first rated inspection in October 2016, with a breach of Regulation 13 identified due to two safeguarding concerns not being reported to the local authority. While caring, effective and responsive practice were rated Good, significant concerns remained around safeguarding governance, an insufficient management handover, and medication recording errors.
Concerns (6)
criticalSafeguarding: “two safeguarding concerns had not been reported to the local authority...Staff had recorded concerns in one person's incident record within their care plan in April 2016, but we found no evidence that this information had been reported”
moderateGovernance: “the handover of information to the new manager was insufficient...checks the area manager told us they had completed, for example, care plan audits were not recorded”
moderateLeadership: “At the moment though, it's a proper mess. The manager has changed, and she doesn't understand how this works really”
moderateMedication management: “some medication errors at the service. For example, a staff member not signing the person's medication administration record to confirm the person had been given their medication”
moderateRecord keeping: “staff did not record when they withdrew monies from a person's monies account...administrator told us they had not been given a copy of the policy as part of their induction”
minorCare planning: “People had risk assessments in place. We found that they could be more personalised and less generic.”
Strengths
· Robust recruitment procedures in place with appropriate DBS checks and references before staff started work
· Staff received ongoing training, supervision and appraisal; new manager proactively reviewed training records
· People told us they were treated with dignity and respect and made positive comments about staff
· People were involved in care planning and changes to care plans were responded to promptly
· Robust complaints process in place with investigation and action taken on complaints
Quality-Statement breakdown (16)
safe: Safeguarding people from abuse and improper treatmentRequires improvement
safe: Risk assessmentsRequires improvement
safe: Medication managementRequires improvement
safe: RecruitmentGood
effective: Health and dietary supportGood
effective: Staff trainingGood
effective: Supervision and appraisalGood
effective: Mental Capacity Act complianceGood
caring: Dignity and respect
Good
caring: Promoting independenceGood
responsive: Activities and engagementGood
responsive: Complaints handlingGood
responsive: Care planning and reviewGood
responsive: End of life careGood
well-led: Leadership and managementGood
well-led: Governance and quality assuranceGood
well-led: People and staff engagementGood
caring: Dignity and respect
Good
caring: Staff knowledge of individual needsGood
responsive: Care planning and reviewGood
responsive: Complaints handlingGood
responsive: Activities and wellbeingGood
well-led: Management handover and information governanceRequires improvement
well-led: Governance and oversight of safeguarding proceduresRequires improvement
well-led: Seeking feedback and resident engagementGood