Moorview Care (East Yorkshire and Hull) improved from Requires Improvement to Good across all five key questions, having resolved previous breaches of regulations relating to staffing, consent, person-centred care, and governance. The only outstanding issue was a minor recommendation to improve recording of best interest decisions.
Concerns (2)
minor
Record keeping
: “The provider did not always keep accurate up to date records when best interest decisions had been made. One person did not have access to their kitchen, although a best interest meeting had taken place, there was no record of the decision-making process.”
minorConsent / capacity: “We recommend the provider reviews best practice guidance in relation to the recording of best interest decisions and updates their practice accordingly.”
Strengths
· Sufficient staffing levels including one-to-one support, with consistent core staff assigned to individuals.
· Effective safeguarding systems and person-centred risk assessments with least restrictive options considered.
· Staff received comprehensive training including positive behaviour support, trauma informed care, and communication tools.
· Personalised care plans including individualised positive behaviour support plans with traffic light systems.
· Strong complaints handling with investigations, responses, and learning identified.
Quality-Statement breakdown (21)
safe: Staffing and recruitmentGood
safe: Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuseGood
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and management; Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
safe: Using medicines safelyGood
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidanceGood
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the lawGood
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experienceGood
effective: Supporting people to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced dietGood
effective: Staff working with other agencies to provide consistent, effective, timely care; supporting people to live healthier livesGood
caring: Ensuring people are well treated and supported; respecting equality and diversity; privacy, dignity and independenceGood
caring: Supporting people to express their views and be involved in making decisions about their careGood
responsive: Planning personalised care to ensure people have choice and control and to meet their needs and preferencesGood
responsive: Meeting people's communication needsGood
responsive: Supporting people to develop and maintain relationships; support to follow interests and activitiesGood
responsive: Improving care quality in response to complaints or concernsGood
responsive: End of life care and supportGood
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about their roles; continuous learning and improving careGood
well-led: Promoting a positive culture that is person-centred, open, inclusive and empoweringGood
well-led: How the provider understands and acts on the duty of candourGood
well-led: Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staff; working in partnership with othersGood
Moorview Care (East Yorkshire and Hull) was rated Requires Improvement across all five key questions at its first inspection in October 2022, with four regulatory breaches identified covering staffing levels, consent, person-centred care, and good governance. Key failures included chronic staff shortages impacting community access and safeguarding, widespread lack of Mental Capacity Act understanding, and ineffective quality assurance systems unable to detect or remediate serious gaps in practice.
Concerns (12)
criticalStaffing levels: “The provider failed to have sufficient staff to meet people's needs, this is a breach of Regulation 18, (Staffing) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008.”
criticalConsent / capacity: “The provider failed to ensure that care and treatment was provided with the consent of the relevant person. This was a breach of Regulation 11.”
criticalGovernance: “There failed to be effective systems in place to monitor and improve the service. Records were not clear or consistent. This was a breach of Regulation 17.”
criticalPerson-centred care: “Failure to provide person-centred care was a breach of Regulation 9 (Person-centred care) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008.”
criticalSafeguarding: “Some people were placed at risk of abuse and restrictive practices due to staffing levels and unmet needs. We made referrals to the local authority safeguarding team.”
moderateCare planning: “Key information about people's behaviours and triggers were not always included within the care plans. This meant people, new staff or agency staff were put at risk.”
moderateMedication management: “Regular checks identified regular errors such as administration errors and incorrect stock levels. Lessons learnt were being considered but did not result in a reduction of errors.”
moderateInfection control: “Some staff were not wearing masks when supporting people as per current government guidance which put people at risk.”
moderateRecord keeping: “Records failed to reflect care was being delivered as directed within people's care plans. We could not be assured that people's care was being delivered in line with the care plan.”
moderateStaff competency: “Management demonstrated a lack of knowledge regarding the Mental Capacity Act. Professionals told us, for a specialist placement, the management lacked knowledge around the legislation.”
minorEnd-of-life care: “People's end of life wishes were not explored and recorded. This was an area we would expect providers to approach with people and their families.”
minorSupervision / appraisal: “Some staff told us supervisions, debriefs and competency checks were rarely completed.”
Strengths
· Recruitment was safe; appropriate checks were completed to ensure staff were of a suitable character to work with vulnerable people.
· Some staff were caring and passionate, with good knowledge of people and their daily routines.
· Processes were in place to ensure the safe administration of medicines including regular monitoring checks.
· Relatives were involved in people's care with regular reviews and meetings.
· People had been supported to maintain contact with their families.
Quality-Statement breakdown (16)
safe: Staffing and recruitmentRequires improvement
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementRequires improvement
safe: Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuseRequires improvement
safe: Using medicines safely; Learning lessons when things go wrongRequires improvement
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionRequires improvement
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidanceRequires improvement
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experienceRequires improvement
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the law
Requires improvement
caring: Ensuring people are well treated and supported; respecting equality and diversityRequires improvement
caring: Respecting and promoting people's privacy, dignity and independence; Supporting people to express their viewsRequires improvement
responsive: Planning personalised care to ensure people have choice and controlRequires improvement
responsive: End of life care and supportRequires improvement
responsive: Improving care quality in response to complaints or concerns; Meeting people's communication needsRequires improvement
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about their roles, understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirementsRequires improvement
well-led: Promoting a positive culture that is person-centred, open, inclusive and empoweringRequires improvement
well-led: How the provider understands and acts on the duty of candourRequires improvement