Nexxus Care (Staffordshire) received a 'Requires Improvement' rating across all five key questions at its first inspection in January–February 2019, with breaches of Regulations 17 and 18 identified relating to governance failures and failure to submit statutory notifications. While staff were caring and safeguarding processes were broadly understood, significant weaknesses were found in medication management, mental capacity assessment, care planning, staff training consistency, and governance oversight.
Concerns (13)
criticalGovernance: “Notifications were not always submitted as required...This is a breach of Regulation 18 of the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009.”
criticalGovernance: “Systems had failed to identify that mental capacity assessments were not fit for purpose...The above constitutes a breach of Regulation 17 of the HSCA 2008.”
moderateMedication management: “Medicines that are needed 'as and when required'...did not always have additional guidance for staff to help them identify when it may or may not be required.”
moderateStaffing levels: “Staff were having to pick up extra calls due to staff shortages and sickness which had an impact on their ability to get to calls on time.”
moderateCare planning: “Details about people's specific health conditions were not always included in people's care plans which left people at risk of receiving inconsistent care.”
moderateConsent / capacity: “The capacity assessment documentation in place was not fit for purpose as they did not include all of the principles of the MCA.”
moderateStaff training: “They sent two staff who just didn't know what to do. They [staff] should have proper training before they come to us.”
moderateRecord keeping: “Care plans did not always contain enough detail...people's care plans did not include details about how people needed to be supported with this.”
moderateIncident learning: “There was minimal analysis of accidents and incidents...no further evidence of looking at particular trends such as the staff involved, day of the week.”
moderateSupervision / appraisal: “Competency checks had only been conducted with reablement staff; the staff supporting people with longer-term care...were awaiting their competency checks.”
minorEnd-of-life care: “There was no detail in the person's plan about their end of life wishes or how they would like to be supported.”
minorPerson-centred care: “People were not always aware of who would be providing their care and they were not informed of changes to the staff scheduled to support them.”
minorCultural competency: “It was not evident that people were offered the opportunity to discuss their sexuality...Sexuality, religion and spirituality is very important.”
Strengths
· Staff understood safeguarding responsibilities and reported concerns to the local safeguarding authority as required.
· Staff wore PPE appropriately, protecting people from the risk of cross infection.
· People felt treated with kindness, respect and dignity by care staff.
· The provider worked in partnership with other organisations and health professionals, including an integrated system with the local authority.
· Lessons were learned when things went wrong, such as investigating medicine errors and missed visits.
Quality-Statement breakdown (21)
safe: Staffing and recruitmentRequires improvement
safe: Using medicines safelyRequires improvement
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementRequires improvement
safe: Systems and processes (safeguarding)Good
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidanceRequires improvement
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standardsRequires improvement
effective: Staff skills, knowledge and experience; supporting people to eat and drinkRequires improvement
effective: Supporting people to live healthier lives and access healthcare servicesGood
caring: Ensuring people are well treated and supported; equality and diversityRequires improvement
caring: Supporting people to express their views and be involved in decisionsRequires improvement
caring: Respecting and promoting people's privacy, dignity and independenceGood
responsive: Personalised careRequires improvement
responsive: End of life care and supportRequires improvement
responsive: Improving care quality in response to complaints or concernsGood
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about roles; understanding quality, performance, risks and regulatory requirementsRequires improvement
well-led: Planning and promoting person-centred, high-quality care; duty of candourRequires improvement
well-led: Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staffRequires improvement
well-led: Continuous learning and improving careRequires improvement
Nexxus Care (Staffordshire) achieved a Good rating across all five key questions at this March 2020 inspection, improving from Requires Improvement across the board since December 2019. The service demonstrated safe, personalised and well-managed domiciliary care for 86 people, with strong leadership, effective multi-agency working and a positive culture of continuous improvement.
Strengths
· People felt safe and staff were confident in recognising and reporting abuse in line with policies and procedures.
· Risk assessments were proactively reviewed and updated by the registered manager to reflect people's changing needs.
· Staff were well trained, knowledgeable and received ongoing refresher training; competency checks were in place for medicines administration.
· People received largely consistent care from familiar staff, supporting their sense of safety and reassurance.
· Care plans were detailed, personalised and developed with involvement from people and their relatives.
Quality-Statement breakdown (25)
safe: Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuseGood
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementGood
safe: Using medicines safelyGood
safe: Staffing and recruitmentGood
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the lawGood
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experienceGood
effective: Supporting people to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced dietGood
effective: Staff working with other agencies to provide consistent, effective, timely careGood
effective: Supporting people to live healthier lives, access healthcare services and supportGood
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidanceGood
caring: Ensuring people are well treated and supported; respecting equality and diversityGood
caring: Supporting people to express their views and be involved in making decisions about their careGood
caring: Respecting and promoting people's privacy, dignity and independenceGood
responsive: Planning personalised care to ensure people have choice and control and to meet their needs and preferencesGood
responsive: Meeting people's communication needsGood
responsive: Improving care quality in response to complaints or concernsGood
responsive: End of life care and supportGood
well-led: Planning and promoting person-centred, high-quality care and support with openness; duty of candourGood
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about their roles, and understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirementsGood
well-led: Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staffGood
well-led: Continuous learning and improving careGood